Mapping the research hotspots and trends in midwifery education: A bibliometric analysis


Kurt N., ÇELİK O. T., SABANCI BARANSEL E., UÇAR T.

Medicine (United States), cilt.105, sa.29, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 105 Sayı: 29
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/md.0000000000049776
  • Dergi Adı: Medicine (United States)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: bibliometrics, education, mapping, midwifery
  • İnönü Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: – Midwifery, which used to be practiced with knowledge passed down from generation to generation, has now gained a professional identity through education. This study examines global trends in midwifery education research using bibliometric methods. Methods: – In the study, we analyzed 1029 studies published in the Web of Science database on midwifery education between 1993–2023. Bibliometric and visualization analyses revealed the general structure of the literature by determining important trends, thematic research areas, the most influential publications, journals, and countries in midwifery education. Results: – According to the results of the analysis, studies on midwifery education have increased significantly in recent years. The increase in publications appears to coincide with the growing prominence of topics such as digitalization, simulation-based learning, and distance education in the literature. Australia stands out as one of the most influential and productive countries in the field of midwifery education. In addition, the continuing care model and simulation-based learning in midwifery were among the most frequently studied topics. Discussion: – The study identifies research trends, priority research areas, and areas for development in midwifery education. The findings provide important insights for the development of midwifery education programs, the support of policymakers’ decision-making processes, and the identification of future research priorities.