Omentopexy versus falciformopexy for peptic ulcer perforation

Olmez, Aydemir; Cicek, EGEMEN; AYDIN, CEMALETTİN; Kaplan, Kuntay; KAYAALP, CÜNEYT

doi:10.14744/tjtes.2019.11387

Omentopexy versus falciformopexy for peptic ulcer perforation

Olmez A., Cicek E., AYDIN C., Kaplan K., KAYAALP C.

ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, cilt.25, sa.6, ss.580-584, 2019 (SCI-Expanded)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 25 Sayı: 6
Basım Tarihi: 2019
Doi Numarası: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.11387
Dergi Adı: ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.580-584
Anahtar Kelimeler: Duodenal ulcer, falciform ligament, gastric ulcer, peptic ulcer, perforated, repair failure, LIGAMENTUM-TERES
İnönü Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUND: Open or laparoscopic Graham's omentopexy is frequently used in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). The technical difficulty of applying the omental plug, especially in patients with previous omentum resection, has led to the use of falciform ligament for the PUP, and some studies have reported that PUP may even be a more advantageous technique than omentopexy. Here, in this study, we aimed to compare the retrospective results of patients who underwent falciformopexy or omentopexy for PUP.