COMPARISON OF MINISCREW-SUPPORTED FACE MASK AND TRADITIONAL FACE MASK TREATMENT IN SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION: TWO CASE REPORTS


Oğuz F.

2 nd International Eurasia Health Sciences Congress , Baku, Azerbaycan, 01 Ocak 2025, ss.1

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Baku
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Azerbaycan
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1
  • İnönü Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The purpose of this case report is to compare the treatment outcomes of two patients with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-supported face masks and conventional face masks.

 

Miniscrew-supported face masks and conventional face masks are commonly used orthodontic appliances for maxillary advancement. Miniscrew-supported face masks apply forces through miniscrews anchored in the upper jaw, resulting in more effective skeletal effects. This approach is particularly advantageous for promoting forward maxillary movement in growing patients. In contrast, conventional face masks are typically supported by teeth, leading to more pronounced dentoalveolar effects. The choice between these methods depends on the patient’s specific needs and treatment objectives.

 

Case 1. A 10-year-9-month-old female patient presented to our clinic for evaluation and treatment. The cephalometric analysis of a lateral film taken before treatment revealed the following values: SNA: 79°, SNB: 81°, ANB: -2°, U1-SN: 104°, IMPA: 90°, GoMe-SN: 34°, and FMA: 25°. A wrist radiograph confirmed that the patient was in the MP3 cap stage of skeletal maturation.

 

The patient underwent treatment with a miniscrew-supported face mask. Post-treatment cephalometric analysis showed the following values: SNA: 84°, SNB: 82°, ANB: 2°, U1-SN: 106°, IMPA: 85°, GoMe-SN: 35°, and FMA: 29°.

 

Case 2. An 11-year-9-month-old male patient presented to our clinic for evaluation and treatment. The cephalometric analysis of a lateral film taken before treatment revealed the following values: SNA: 76°, SNB: 84°, ANB: -6°, U1-SN: 110°, IMPA: 80°, GoMe-SN: 31°, and FMA: 25°. A wrist radiograph indicated that the patient was in the PP3= stage of skeletal maturation.

 

Post-treatment cephalometric analysis showed significant improvements, with the following values: SNA: 84°, SNB: 86°, ANB: -2°, U1-SN: 112°, IMPA: 84°, GoMe-SN: 29°, and FMA: 26°.

 

Conclusion: Patients with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion were successfully managed using both miniscrew-supported and traditional face mask treatments. Incorporating miniscrew support into face mask therapy, particularly during the growth period, proves effective in promoting desired skeletal changes.