Neuromuscular activation following anti-movement and dynamic core training: a randomized controlled comparative study


ÇINARLI F. S., KAFKAS M. E.

European Journal of Applied Physiology, cilt.125, sa.9, ss.2449-2459, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 125 Sayı: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00421-025-05768-4
  • Dergi Adı: European Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, MEDLINE, SportDiscus, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2449-2459
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Core training, Electromyography, Muscle activation, Resistance training, Spine
  • İnönü Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: This study investigated the effects of anti-movement and dynamic core training on neuromuscular activation in trained men using surface electromyography (sEMG). Methods: Thirty-six participants were randomized into the anti-movement (AMG), traditional dynamic (TDG), or control (CG) groups in a controlled study. Training groups performed core exercises twice weekly for 6 weeks, with standardized time under tension (AMG: 30-s isometric holds; TDG: 30 s with 12 repetitions). Anterior and posterior trunk muscle activation was measured using sEMG during isometric endurance tests pre- and post-intervention. Results: Significant time and interaction effects were observed for lumbar erector spinae (LES) activation (F = 3.784, p = 0.029), with AMG (p = 0.016) and TDG (p = 0.004) outperforming CG. A significant enhancement in external oblique (EO; η2 = 0.17, p = 0.023) and internal oblique (IO; η2 = 0.30, p = 0.003) activation was observed in the AMG compared to the CG. Both training groups improved LES (η2 = 0.37, p = 0.001) and multifidus (η2 = 0.19, p = 0.016) activation (p < 0.017). Within-group analysis showed significant pre-to-post improvements across all muscles (p < 0.05, effect size r = 0.48–0.63). Greater reductions in muscle activation (22.17%–53%) were demonstrated by the AMG compared to the TDG (16.18%–28.82%), suggesting improved neuromuscular efficiency. Conclusion: Anti-movement core training effectively enhances trunk muscle neuromuscular activation and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to traditional protocols.