MPN-139 Is Ferric Carboxymaltose a Safer Option Compared to Iron Sucrose?


Sarıcı A., Tanrıverdi L. H.

Society of Hematologic Oncology 2023 Annual Meeting, Texas, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 6 - 09 Eylül 2023, cilt.23, ss.384 identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Cilt numarası: 23
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/s2152-2650(23)01222-3
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Texas
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.384
  • İnönü Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction:

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by recurring inflammation in the colon. Various treatment options are available, but there remains a need for effective therapies that can induce and maintain remission. Ozanimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, has shown promise in the treatment of UC. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of ozanimod on induction and maintenance of remission in patients with UC through available randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, from inception to April 1, 2023. RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozanimod in patients with UC were included. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, intervention protocols, and outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes. Subgroup analysis was also performed.

Results:

Two RCTs with 842 UC patients were included. Ozanimod significantly improved clinical remission (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.80-4.90, P< 0.01), clinical response (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.42-2.15), histologic healing (RR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.52-3.63), and mucosal healing (RR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.87-5.23) during induction therapy. In maintenance therapy, ozanimod showed benefits in maintaining clinical remission (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.54-2.84, P< 0.01), clinical response (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.30-1.86), histologic remission (RR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.62-3.10), and mucosal healing (RR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.58-3.09). Subgroup analysis confirmed ozanimod's efficacy regardless of prior anti-TNF use, disease location, corticosteroid use at screening, or baseline partial Mayo score. However, there were trends suggesting that ozanimod may be particularly beneficial in patients who were naive to prior anti-TNF therapy, had left side disease involvement, or did not use corticosteroids at screening. Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, serious infections, and upper respiratory infections. Infrequent serious adverse events were comparable in both arms.

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis supports ozanimod's efficacy and safety in UC remission induction and maintenance, highlighting its therapeutic potential. Further large-scale RCTs are needed for confirmation and expansion of these findings (Figure 1).