GÖRMELİ, C. A. Et Al. 2016. Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?. BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA , vol.27, no.3 , 954-958.

GÖRMELİ, C. A., YAGMUR, J., ÖZDEMİR, R., OZDEMIR, Z. M., KAHRAMAN, A. S., & ÇOLAK, C., (2016). Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?. BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA , vol.27, no.3, 954-958.

GÖRMELİ, CEMİLE Et Al. "Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?," BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA , vol.27, no.3, 954-958, 2016

GÖRMELİ, CEMİLE A. Et Al. "Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?." BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA , vol.27, no.3, pp.954-958, 2016

GÖRMELİ, C. A. Et Al. (2016) . "Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?." BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA , vol.27, no.3, pp.954-958.

@article{article, author={CEMİLE AYŞE GÖRMELİ Et Al. }, title={Comparison of myocardial bridging prevalence using 64-slice versus 256-slice computed tomography scanners: What has changed with recent innovations in CT?}, journal={BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA}, year=2016, pages={954-958} }